Relative Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policy Shocks on the Ethiopian Economic Growth: A Structural Vector Autoregressive Model

Author(s)

Tesfay Gebrehiwet ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 08-20 | Views: 322 | Downloads: 139 | DOI:

Volume 1 - December 2019 (12)

Abstract

Shocks on fiscal and monetary policies affect the economic growth of countries either positively or negatively. The objective of this paper was to examine the relative effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policy shock on the Ethiopian economic growth. To examine the dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy shocks on the Ethiopian economic growth Structural Vector Autoregressive model was employed for seasonally adjusted quarterly data from 1991Q1 up to 2016Q1. Short-run recursive identification or Cholesky identification technique was used to identify structural shocks in the SVAR model. The result of impulse response and variance decomposition shows that both fiscal and monetary policy shocks have a positive effect on the Ethiopian economic growth. However, fiscal policy shocks are more effective than monetary policy shocks in boosting Ethiopian economic growth. Specifically, government expenditure is most effective followed by government tax revenue in enhancing Ethiopian economic growth.

Keywords

Fiscal policy Shock, Monetary policy Shock, SVAR, IRFs, the Ethiopian economy

References

                    i.             Aarle et al. (2003). Monetary and fiscal policy transmission in the Euro-area : evidence from a structural VAR analysis. Journal of Economics and Business 55, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(03)00056-0

      ii.            Ajisafe and Folorunso. (2002). The Relative Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policy in Macroeconomic Management in Nigeria. The African Economic and Business Review, 3(1).

    iii.            Ali,  et al. (2008). Whether Fiscal Stance or Monetary Policy is Effective for Economic Growth in Case of South Asian Countries? Pakistan Development Review, 47, 791–799. https://doi.org/10.30541/v47i4iipp.791-799

     iv.            Andersen and Jordan. (1968). Monetary and Fiscal Actions: A Test of Their Relative Importance in Economic Stabilization. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 68. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.68.29-44.vcn

       v.            Ansari. (1996). Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Some Evidence from Vector Autoregression for India. Journal of Asian Economics, 7.

     vi.            Atchariyachanvanich, W. (2007). International Differences in the Relative Monetary-Fiscal Influence on Economic Stabilization. Journal of International Economic Studies, 21.

   vii.            Batten and Hafer. (1983). The Relative Impact of Monetary and Fiscal Actions on Economic Activity : A Cross-Country Comparison.

 viii.            Blanchard and Perotti. (1999). An Empirical Characterization of The Dynamic effects of Changes in Government Spending And Taxes on Output in the United States (No. 7269).

     ix.            Bleaney et al. (2000). Testing The Endogenous Growth Model: public Expenditure, Taxation, and Growth Over The Long-run.

       x.            Cardia. (1991). The dynamics of a small open economy in response to monetary, fiscal, and productivity shocks. Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 28.

     xi.            Carlson. (1975). The St. Louis Equation and Monthly Data.

   xii.            Chowdhury. (1986). Monetary and Fiscal Impacts on Economic Activities in Bangladesh: A Note. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 14(1), 101–106.

 xiii.            Elias and Cyrus. (2014). Monetary and fiscal policy shocks and economic growth in Kenya: VAR econometric approach. Journal of World Economic Research, 3. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20140306.14

 xiv.            Elliott. (1975). The Influence of Monetary and Fiscal Actions on Total Spending: The St. Louis Total Spending Equation Revisited. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 7(2), 181–192.

   xv.            Enders, W. (2010). Applied Econometric Time Series.

 xvi.            Feldstein. (2002). The Role for Discretionary Fiscal Policy in a Low-Interest Rate Environment.

xvii.            Friedman, M, and Meiselman, D. (1963). The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and the Investment Multiplier in the United States,1897-1958, in Stabilization Policies, In Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

xviii.            Gupta and Laumas. (1983). Some Properties of Fiscal and Monetary Policy Multipliers. Southern Economic Journal, 49(4).

 xix.            Haller, A. (2012). Concepts of Economic Growth and Development. Challenges of Crisis and of Knowledge. Romanian Academy Branch of Iasi, ROMANIA, 15(1/2012), 66–71.

   xx.            Hamilton. (1994). Time Series Analysis: Princeton University Press.

 xxi.            Havi and Enu. (2014). The Effect of Fiscal Policy and Monetary Policy on Ghana’s Economic Growth: Which Policy is More Potent? International Journal of Empirical Finance, 3.

xxii.            Hillier, B. (1997). The Macroeconomic Debate: Models of the Closed and Open Economy.

xxiii.            Hussain. (2014). Empirical Econometric Analysis of Relationship Between Fiscal - Monetary Policies and Output on SAARC Countries. Journal of Developing Areas, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2014.0072

xxiv.            Hussain, M. (1982). The Relative Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policy : An Econometric Case Study of Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 20(2).

xxv.            Ikhide and Olaloye. (1995). Economic Sustainability and The Role of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in Depressed Economy: The Case of Nigeria. Sustainable Development, 3.

xxvi.            Jawaid et al. (2011). Monetary-fiscal-trade policy and economic growth in Pakistan: time series empirical investigation. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 1(32680).

xxvii.            Johnston and Dinardo. (1997). Econometric Methods Fourth Edition.

xxviii.            Kneller et al. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth : evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 74.

xxix.            Kratzig and Lutkepohl. (2004). Applied Time Series Econometrics (Vol. 1 and 2). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

xxx.            Lipsey and Steiner. (1981). Economics (6thed.) New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

xxxi.            Mahmood and Sial. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Economic Growth: A Case Study of Pakistan. Asian Economic and Social Society The, 1(4).

xxxii.            Mankiw, N. G. (2007). Macroeconomics, Seventh Edition.

xxxiii.            Mankiw, N. G. (2010). Principles of Microeconomics, Fourth Edition.

xxxiv.            Mengesha, M. (2016). The Impact of Monetary Policy on Output and Price in Ethiopia.

xxxv.            Mulay, W. (2016). Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Ethiopia.

xxxvi.            Owoye and Onafowora. (1994). The relative importance of monetary and fiscal policies in selected African countries. Applied Economics, 26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849400000124

xxxvii.            Pedro. (2010). Fiscal dynamics in Ethiopia: The cointegrated VAR model with quarterly data.

xxxviii.            Petrevski et al. (2015). Fiscal and monetary policy effects in three South-Eastern European economies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-0932-0

xxxix.            Rahman, H. (2005). Relative Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policies on Output Growth in Bangladesh : A VAR Approach. Bangladesh Journal of Political Economy, 22.

     xl.            Rakic B. et al. (2013). The Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policy in Serbia. Industrial, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.5937/industrija41-4011

   xli.            Ravnik and Zilik. (2011). The Use of SVAR analysis in determining the effects of fiscal shocks in Croatia. Financial Theory and Practice, 35(1).

 xlii.            Rebman et al. (1982). Macro-economics : An introduction to Keynesian -Neoclassical Controversies, Second Edition.

xliii.            Robinson. (1997). How Macroeconomic Factor AffectIncome Distribution :

xliv.            Sawyer and Sprinkle. (2003). Applied International Economics: Fourth Edition.

 xlv.            Senbet. (2011). The Relative Impact of Fiscal versus Monetary Actions on Output : A Vector Autoregressive ( VAR ) Approach. Business and Economics Journal, 2011(BEJ-25).

xlvi.            Simorangkir, I., & Adamanti, J. (2010). The Role of Fiscal Stimulus and Monetary Easing in Indonesian Economy During Global Financial Crisis: Financial Computable General Equilibrium Approach. Bulletin of Monetary, Economics and Banking, 2, 165–186.

xlvii.            Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1–48.

xlviii.            Solomon, T. (2016). Fiscal Policy, Public Investment, and Economic Growth in Ethiopia. http://etd.aau.edu.et/bitstream/handle/123456789/14923/

xlix.            Teweldebrehan, T. (2010). The Macroeconomic Debate: Models of the Closed and Open Economy. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

        l.            Ubogu, R. E. (1985). The potency of Monetary and Fiscal Policy Instruments on Economic Activities of African Countries, University of Lagos, Nigeria. Saving and Development, 9, 441–457.

                li.            Waud. (1974). Monetary and Fiscal Effects on Economic Activity: A Reduced Form Examination of their Relative Importance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(2).

Cite this Article: